<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Economics and the environment, part 1</title>
	<atom:link href="http://bioblog.biotunes.org/bioblog/2008/03/11/economics-and-the-environment-part-1/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://bioblog.biotunes.org/bioblog/2008/03/11/economics-and-the-environment-part-1/</link>
	<description>Biology News Biology Blog</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Jan 2012 14:11:55 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Anonymous</title>
		<link>http://bioblog.biotunes.org/bioblog/2008/03/11/economics-and-the-environment-part-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 22:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://bioblog.biotunes.org/bioblog/?p=100#comment-98</guid>
		<description>&lt;i&gt;(This is despite the obvious counter argument that a genuine government mandate to develop alternative energy sources would spur a whole new economy for the U.S. However, the tangible economic benefits would not be immediate, but long term, which does not play well in capitalist societies.)&lt;/i&gt;&lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;Creating an industry whose only contribution to society is to satisfy a government regulation would &#039;create&#039; an economy just like breaking all the windows in a city would lead to a boom in the glass industry.  &lt;br/&gt;&lt;br/&gt;But economically literate people wouldn&#039;t make the mistake of calling that a benefit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><i>(This is despite the obvious counter argument that a genuine government mandate to develop alternative energy sources would spur a whole new economy for the U.S. However, the tangible economic benefits would not be immediate, but long term, which does not play well in capitalist societies.)</i></p>
<p>Creating an industry whose only contribution to society is to satisfy a government regulation would &#8216;create&#8217; an economy just like breaking all the windows in a city would lead to a boom in the glass industry.  </p>
<p>But economically literate people wouldn&#8217;t make the mistake of calling that a benefit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

